Your address will show here +12 34 56 78
Articles



By Kostas Voutsinas |

A lot of leadership programs are driven from CEO or Directors in cooperation with Human Resources Department. They both choose an external consultant to run a leadership program. At most of the time their decision is based at price and references. They develop a plan, with a duration of three -four months, with steps and tools, and urge people to follow it with passion. Several months later, the project owners realize that there were no results on behaviors. However, they believe that they gave to their leaders the proper tools to improve themselves.

The usual argumentation when it comes to leadership development are:

  • “We have a training program. Our people follow a leadership seminar”: Good but not enough. Seminars by themselves can’t change existing situation. People can. If people, especially those at high hierarchy, don’t involve directly at the design and implementation of the program, fail is assured. It’s people that create strategy, implement it and they can reassure that a leadership program is in alignment with strategy and company’s culture. Improving competencies by itself it’s not enough. They should fit the company’s culture, it’s rhythm and strongly connected with strategy and business requirements. Participants need to understand the “why” and the “how” they will succeed.  
  •  “More or less leadership is the same at all organization, is about people. We choose the best trainings programs of the market and we urge our leaders to motivate staff and develop them”: Leadership has certain aspects that are common at organizations. It’s true that leadership is about people. However, each organization is different. A company that focuses on production needs a different leadership that a company that sells services as software or training. Furthermore, a company that its product strategy focuses on “added value” to customer should have a leadership style more supportive than a company which the competitive advantage focus on “low price”. So, by running a leadership program from “the shelf of the market” doesn’t ensure success. Although might have an excellent reputation and a good context, it doesn’t necessarily focus at the competencies that needed to be improved. Critical decision for the company is always taken from the people worked at the company after a lot of discussions, presentation and argumentation. In our case is management and experts than should analyze and decide which leadership style fits better their organization and the competencies needed to be improved.    
  •  “We have run leadership seminars but after a small period our leaders’ return to their previous leadership behaviors”: If your organization is running effectively, is probably because your leaders do something right. And if they successful, it’s normal that they will return on  the same methodology. They know that it works. 
  • If leadership programs are not adopted to everyday life they have to hope to be implemented . First of all leaders should understand the why and the how, they need to know not only the target but the path as well. Where we are now and where we have to go. People need to understand the competencies gap in a simple way. “Why” we do it, “how” we will proceed, “what” we are waiting at the end to gain. General leadership seminars give general instruction of personal development. This won’t work. Before the seminar reassure that the leaders of your organization know the “why” and the benefits. Secondly, reassure the the pathway is concrete and tailor made. From my experience, most of the time the path is consisted from a mix of leadership techniques, self evaluation and personal development. The development path should be concrete and well bond. At most of the times small steps are more effective because they can fit easier to reality than general concepts. The micro learning methodology can be very effective when running at a proper rhythm. Coaching can also be an excellent tool when is applied with methodology from people that really want to help others.
  • “We have analyzed the situation and we gave our leaders the tools to develop themselves, but the results are poor”: Analyzing is not enough. Leadership is not mathematics, is about people, is about motivation, is about upgrading, is about accelerating, is about seeing opportunities, it is about execution and finally is about results. There is no way to put all those in an algorithm. It is not only communication and motivation. It’s also leadership style, authenticity and influence. The road is not prescribed, is creating step by step. So, is more than number and analysis of the gap. It is about commitment, believing at the target and throw yourself in. It is authenticity, so your principles are in alignment with your action and your behavior includes energy, aura that urge people. And is also the capability to see in depth the people you manage. How they feel, what is success for them and finally how the leader should create a valuable connection with the team. 

Conclusions

  • The program should be in alignment with strategy and companies’ culture. Competencies should be directly connected with strategy and key business requirements and answers the “why” question.
  • Management and experts of the company -together, as a team- should be directly involved to the design and implementation of all stages of the leadership program. It is also important to monitor the program during the implementation phase. 
  • The decision of which competencies needed to be improved, is taken from the management and experts of the company before any program take place. Usually, it’s the results of a research and should be seen as a long-term investment. 
  • The development path should be directly connected to the competencies. Participants need to know how they will improve their competencies successfully. A path with small steps, like microlearning and coaching reassure success better than a general program.
  • Leadership is more than a simple job, is a commitment. Leaders should commit themselves and top management should create an environment that motivates people and create a space so that people have the time and the opportunity to apply new knowledge.
  • And finally, always have in mind that not all people are willing to commit themselves. The role of a leader is difficult and lonely. It’s a personal decision.

 

0


ΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΤΟ THE LEADER SPEAKS

Οι μεγάλοι ηγέτες έχουν την ικανότητα να κάνουν “την φωνή  τους” να ακουστεί δυνατά. Το πρόγραμμα Leader Speaks είναι ένα ιδιαίτερα  βιωματικό workshop, το οποίο έχει σχεδιαστεί για να παρέχει στους συμμετέχοντες  την μεθοδολογία και τις ευκαιρίες  πρακτικής εξάσκησης με στόχο να επιταχύνει ουσιαστικά την αποτελεσματικότητα  της επικοινωνίας τους.

Η ισχυρή ηγετική επικοινωνία δεν είναι ένα εγγενές χαρακτηριστικό που προορίζεται για λίγα χαρισματικά άτομα. Είναι μια παρατηρήσιμη, φυσική διαδικασία που έχει χρησιμοποιηθεί από μεγάλους ηγέτες σε όλη την διάρκεια του ανθρώπινου πολιτισμού. Η αποτελεσματική επικοινωνία δεν είναι  απλά μια ακόμη ηγετική ικανότητα. Είναι η καρδία της ηγεσίας και διαπερνά όλα όσα κάνει ο ηγέτης. Έχει σχέση περισσότερο με δύναμη και κουράγιο και λιγότερο με λεκτική επικοινωνία.

Οι συμμετέχοντες μέσα από μια σειρά συζητήσεων, ασκήσεων και εξάσκησης θα μάθουν πώς να χρησιμοποιούν τα φυσικά τους ταλέντα και να έχουν ενα άμεσο και θετικό αντίκτυπο στα υπόλοιπα άτομα της οργάνωσης και πέραν αυτής. Θα βελτιώσουν τις  ικανότητες τους να μιλούν με επιρροή, να μπορούν να κάνουν το ακροατήριο τους να  τους πιστέψει και να τους ακολουθήσει προς ένα κοινό στόχο.

Στο πρόγραμμα οι συμμετέχοντες θα μάθουν πώς θα μπορέσουν  μέσα από την επικοινωνία να δημιουργούν  Ενθουσιασμό, Ευθυγράμμιση και  Δέσμευση προς τους στόχους του οργανισμού. Τότε και μόνο τότε η επικοινωνία του  ηγέτη μετατρέπεται  σε πράξη γιατί το σημαντικό δεν είναι η απόδοση αλλά ο αντίκτυπος του ηγέτη.

Για αναλυτικότερες πληροφορίες  των περιεχομένων ανοίξτε το επισυναπτόμενο αρχείο TLS.

ΠOY και ΠOTE

Το βιωματικό εργαστήριο The Leader Speaks  θα διεξαχθεί στις 12 Ιουλίου στο  Ξενοδοχείο Parthenon Airotel. (πλησίον μετρό Ακρόπολη)

Διάρκεια 9.00 – 16.30.

Για να δηλώσετε συμμετοχή απλά αποστείλετε  ένα e mail με τα στοιχεία επικοινωνία σας  στην διεύθυνση: info@actionpoint.gr. Εναλλακτικά μπορείτε να επικοινωνήσετε στα 210 3002714 ή στο 6941421040.

Κόστος Συμμετοχής : 170 € + ΦΠΑ. Εάν δηλώσετε εσυμμετοχή εως και την Παρασκευή 7 Ιουλίου: 130€ + ΦΠΑ.

Χορηγείται  βεβαίωση συμμετοχής.

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ

www.actionpoint.gr , E-mail: info@actionpoint.gr

Τηλέφωνα επικοινωνίας:  210 3002714 ή  Κιν: 6941421040  (Καθημερινές 8.30-18.00)

ΤΑ ΣΕΜΙΝΑΡΙΑ ΜΑΣ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΝ ΝΑ ΕΠΙΔΟΤΗΘΟΥΝ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΛΑΕΚ  0,24% ΤΟΥ ΟΑΕΔ

ΕΙΣΗΓΗΤΗΣ

Κώστας Βουτσινάς

Trainer, Σύμβουλος  Ανάπτυξης  Ανθρώπινου Δυναμικού, Context Developer

  • Είναι πτυχιούχος του Οικονομικού τμήματος του Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών, κάτοχος ΜΒΑ από το Vrije Universiteit  of Brussels  και του  Master in Distance Learning από το Ανοιχτό Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών.  Έχει διατελέσει επί σειρά ετών στέλεχος  σε ελληνικές  και πολυεθνικές εταιρείες σε θέσεις  ανάπτυξης ανθρώπινου δυναμικού καθώς και σε εμπορικές θέσεις. 
  • Είναι πιστοποιημένος  εισηγητής από την Bluepoint Leadership Development καθώς και από τρείς ακόμη πολυεθνικούς οργανισμούς ανάπτυξης ανθρώπινου δυναμικού.
  • Έχει εργαστεί σαν project Leader σε μεγάλα έργα ανάπτυξης  και καθοδήγησης ανθρώπινου δυναμικού στην Ελλάδα και στην Ευρώπη.  Έχει σχεδιάσει και αναπτύξει  ακαδημίες πωλήσεων και μάνατζμεντ για δυο εταιρείες σε Ελλάδα και Ευρώπη.
  • Εστιάζεται στην δημιουργία ενός συστήματος συνεχούς εκπαίδευσης το οποίο δεν στοχεύει απλά στην επιμόρφωση αλλά στην ανάπτυξη των στελεχών με τρόπο που να μπορούν να δημιουργήσουν αξία στον οργανισμό που ανήκουν. 
0

Articles

by Kostas Voutsinas|

Nowadays, due to increasing competition buyers focus more and more on cost cutting. Suppliers provide lots of products and services at low price to satisfy buyers’ expectations. However, for many companies low priced competition is meaningless and risky. On the other hand, according to Porter’s Generic Competitive Strategies, to set a high price one should differentiate the product and develop a position far from commodity.

It is needed a total approach that differentiates your product or services based on your competitive advantage, a Premium Offer.

There are four elements that contribute equally in developing a premium offer.

  • Offer and Price
  • Service Alignment
  • Quality Standards
  • Sales Excellence
  1. DEFINE OFFER AND PRICE

Does price determine your position at the market? The answer is no. However, we shouldn’t underestimate that many buyers consider low price as the main criteria when buying, whereas others feel more confident with their suppliers when price is high. Once the price reflect a competitive advantage then a higher price is acceptable. Some brands are identified with premium price like Rolex, Mercedes, etc. So the question that rises is: Can I support a low price or Should I define and develop a competitive advantage to differentiate my product and set a higher price?

When you choose the Premium Price policy then you have to formulate your Offer. Offer is what you are capable to provide your customer as a total, is the product and the services and the benefit. It is also your position in the Market. Practically,  there are three different Main Strategies:

  • Choose a Niche of the market, become an expert
  • Develop a Customer Oriented Organization
  • Create an Added Value for you clients that influence his business or a concrete advantage

Once you decide the strategy of your offer, you should align Services, Quality & Sales Force

  1. DEFINE YOUR SERVICES

From a helicopter point of view services at a certain industry looks almost the same. Nevertheless clients’ expectations are not. Clients expect different response when dealing with a “Niche/Expertise Offer” and different from a “Value Added Offer”.

  • If you choose a “Niche” at the market you are probably an expert/specialist. Your customers expect a solution oriented approach and expertise. They also expect operation acumen and innovation.
  • At a “Customer Oriented Offer” your customer probably expect tailor made solutions, quick response and skilled people on services. Furthermore, they expect a secure environment & a trustfully cooperation. Trust is the platform on which he will develop his competitive advantage.
  • At a “Value Added Offer” client expect profound knowledge of his industry and capability to provide total solutions. They await a consultative approach, a capability to search opportunities, support their competitive advantage and/or to create excellence at their organizations.
  • Services should be in alignment with the nature of your offer and customer expectations. Services support your product and justify your price. Thought your customers should feel and understand the differentiation of your Offer.
  1. SET QUALITY STANDARDS

In a completive market even “low price” players set a minimum standard in quality. Quality doesn’t mean perfection. Quality is relative and is the proper mix of product, person and resources that work together to meet your customer expectations. It should be in alignment to your offer and it involves all stakeholders. Quality doesn’t provide results; it is a set of criteria and KPI’s that ensure a long term development of your competitive advantage.

The latest approach of McKinsey concerning Organization Health provides a profound and practical analysis that comes very handy when setting the qualities standards. The most important points are:

  • Accountability: Who is the responsible from each activity? How he contribute to the completive advantage and to your Offer?
  • Capabilities & Resources: Capabilities of persons and capabilities of team. Reassure that your resources can support your plan. Give time to people.
  • Leadership & Coordination: Credibility is the most important element for a leader. It also important to be able to change hats from an inspired leader to a tactical manager and a smart coordinator.
  • Culture and Climate: Once you decide to have a continuous improvement on your offer you need a continuous flow of information, ideas and persistence. A customer oriented culture, a sense of urgency and a safe environment that motivates people is prerequisite for success.
  • Your Service and Product: Quality of the product you provide is a prerequisite for success. However is not perfection. It is more important to stadarise your product and your services so that our customer receives the same outcome and the same benefit.
  1. DEVELOP SALES EXCELLENCE

Let’s also make it clear, Excellence doesn’t exist. What you need is a customer oriented organization and the right salespersons which mean that their knowledge and skills are in alignment to your Offer.

Sales force is much more that service. They design the premium image on customers’ mind (psychological side) and built with logical steps you price level (business side). The sales approach is depending on your offer.

  • A low price offer goes along usually with transactional sales approach.
  • If you choose a “Niche” the sales approach is less transactional, more assertive and consultative where needed.
  • To foster a “Customer Oriented Offer” the approach is more relational, more consultative and no transactional.
  • A “Value Added Offer” needs a consultative and trustful approach. It also need to build relation with executive level buyers
0

Articles

by Bluepoint Leadership Development |

“If a man takes no thought of what is distant, he will find sorrow near at hand.” – Confucius
For leaders, experience is by far the best teacher. It teaches them how to adhere to core values, coach and mentor others, encourage creativity and innovation and inspire diverse populations – all very important leadership competencies and practices. Unfortunately, this same experience is an untrustworthy guide for the world we are about to enter. To continue to have a real impact on their organizations, leaders are well advised to peer into the past to understand the future. We are already in the early stages of a global, digital economy that is completely dismantling and recreating our existing social and financial frameworks. Markets are becoming increasingly volatile, key talent is in short supply, information is rapidly and broadly dispersed, and traditional organizations are flattening, being turned upside down and are losing their boundaries. This frenetic pace of change will likely continue unabated for the foreseeable future. And a new chapter in leadership is about to begin: Leadership 4.0.
The evolving nature of organizations and leadership to understand the future of leadership, it is helpful to look back over the last century to gain an appreciation for the evolving nature of organizations and resulting demands on their leaders.

Leadership 1.0: The Production Systems Leader (1900-1980) Prior to 1900, leadership was seen as primarily a political, religious and military matter. Enterprises were typically very small and organized around a craftsman or owner who personally directed all activities. In the early 1900’s, three huge shifts in technology occurred which laid the groundwork for a whole new way of organizing and leading. In 1901, Marconi transmitted the first trans-Atlantic radio message, in 1903 the Wright brothers made the first powered flight, and in 1908 Henry Ford started mass-producing the Model T automobile. These dramatic advances in communication, travel and automation were a tipping point for organizations. Now larger organizations were created, and the prime concern of their leaders was the efficient operation of repetitive production systems to satisfy a growing demand for products and services. Organizations tended to be highly structured and pyramidal, and employees usually remained in the same organization or vocation for their entire careers. Order, predictability and constancy were the watchwords of the day.

Leadership 2.0: The Quality performance Leader (1980-2000). In the early 1980’s, intense international competition, primarily from Japan, spurred a major shift toward quality. The prime concern of leaders was to create products and services at the top end of the measurement scale, whatever that might be. They sought to produce the best, least expensive, fastest, strongest or most attractive version of their product or service. Waste, defects, delays and inefficiencies were targeted for elimination. Organizations became highly matrixed and most employees had a significant process improvement element in their job. The emergence of downsizing irreversibly altered the employee-employer relationship.

Leadership 3.0: The opportunistic enterprisers (2000-to present day).  As we entered into a new century, productivity improvement tools (Internet, email, and social media) gave employees unprecedented access to information and networks as well as unprecedented penetration of their work into their personal lives. Opportunities abounded. The prime concern of these leaders was to capitalize on the huge shifts in technology, connection capability and commerce. Organizations became more fluid and often spawned ad hoc teams to

Leadership 4.0: …a brave new approach for a new generation. “If a man takes no thought of what is distant, he will find sorrow near at hand.” – Confucius
pursue emerging opportunities. Booms and busts were equally common. So what will Leadership 4.0 look like? While the substantial amounts of change we will likely face in the next few decades make the future quite murky, we can be pretty sure of four challenges leaders will face.

1. Talent acquisition and talent development will likely be the number one competitive advantage.
Technological advantages will become increasingly rare so organizations will need to rely upon their talent to be competitive in the marketplace. The increased value of creativity and innovation will increase the productivity gap between average and top performers (e.g. top performers may be ten times as productive as average performers). Added to this will be the fact that skills and knowledge will quickly become irrelevant, and leaders will need to ensure that their talent pool is continually learning and developing just to stay even.

2. Communication will no longer be seen as a leadership competency but something that is synonymous with leadership.
The constant effort to push more information into organizations will cease. Information will become ubiquitous. People will have immediate access to any and all information related to their work. The leader’s role will change from providing accurate and timely information that helps people do their jobs to one that gets people to think differently and act in concert. People will not need more information; they will need more meaning and purpose, something that will draw them together in a common endeavor.

3. Innovation will be everyone’s business.
Innovation will no longer be the sole purview of R&D. To survive and thrive in a hypercompetitive world, everyone in the organization will need to be innovating — generating new products and services, finding new ways to serve customers, identifying unconventional revenue streams. Leaders will need to create environments in which people at all levels bring their very best creative talents to this work.

4. Leading Change will become everyday work.
Organization change will no longer be a discreet activity initiated by intermittent economic, demographic and technological forces but rather it will become a constant state of operation. Leaders will need to continuously cycle through a process of creating pathways, sharing expertise, and coaching others on personal change.
Leaders must get to the future first. They need to be scouts, prophets and pathfinders. Go there, discover what it is like and return to teach others. As novelist William Gibson said, “The future is already here – it is just unevenly distributed.” This is an incredibly exciting time for leaders who are prepared to step up to a whole new set of challenges. Never has great leadership been so important and never has it been in shorter supply.
0

Articles


by Susanne Biro |
My mother and father were European, Austrian and Hungarian to be specific. One of the things this meant for me growing up was that if someone came to our house, everyone had to come out from wherever they were, say hello, and immediately we had to offer that person a drink (preferably alcoholic). If the person stayed for more than 30 minutes, it was necessary to offer them food and then, even if they declined (and sometimes especially if they declined), feed them. Providing the basic necessities of life (drink and food) was understood as a sign of abundance and wealth. We had it to give away and my parents took great delight in sharing what we had. If a guest refused our offerings, we (especially my mother), took offense. “What’s wrong with my cooking?” she would demand. “Mom, maybe they just aren’t hungry,” I would try to reason in front of our increasingly uncomfortable guest. She couldn’t conceive of it. The funny thing is that now when I enter someone’s home and they fail to offer me a drink, I find it strange, even a little rude. That’s the thing with culture, it colors how we interpret everything and, for the most part, we are blind to it.
Culture is the mostly unspoken, “this is how we do things here.” And it encompasses the, “This is who we are as a collection of people. These are the values we hold dear. This is how we treat each other, talk to each other, and regard each other. This is how we show respect and disrespect. And, this is how we come together to get stuff done.” Every collection of people has a culture. And we know immediately when we are not in a familiar one.
So once a culture, specifically a corporate culture, is established, how do we go about changing it?
Of course, this is no simple task. However, below are five guiding principles:
1. If real estate is location, location, location, then attempting to lead culture change is communicate, communicate, communicate. 2. You must first clarify the story for yourself: the company is moving from what to what exactly? You should be able to craft this story using nothing more than three power point slides: a slide that tells the story of the past, a slide that encompasses the realities of today, and a slide that paints a vision for a better tomorrow. It is irrelevant whether or not you actually use the slides to communicate with your audience. The purpose of the exercise is to ensure you are crystal clear on the key elements of the story and you can tell it in an interesting, visual way. 3. You might consider your new title as “Chief Marketing Officer” as it would benefit you greatly to think in terms of a logo, tagline, and headline. For example, when Lou Gerstner Jr. took over IBM, he used this simple phrase to communicate the vast and complex change the business would need to undergo in order to survive: “We used to be a computer parts company. We are now going to be a service company that, by the way, just happens to have some computer parts.” 4. In your communication, you must clearly name that this is a break from the past: “The past is over and the future will look and feels like ‘this’.” You might consider incorporating a ritual to get people to fully understand that the past is no more. Kenny Moore of KeySpan Corp. held a funeral to say goodbye to the company as it once was.
Changing Your Corporate Culture SuSanne Biro
5. You must live the new cultural values and norms impeccably. Not only that, you must be an ambassador for them. You must catch any words or actions that are not in alignment with the new culture and appropriately redirect behavior because everyone is watching to see if this change is going to be real. As the saying goes, “All that is necessary for evil to exist in the world is for good people to stand by and do nothing.” If you do nothing when people continue to behave in the ways of the past, you essentially say to everyone that the change is not real. You might consider how The Broken Window Theory might be useful. This theory states that if a window is broken and left unrepaired, people walking by will conclude that no one cares and no one is in charge, sending a signal to all that anything goes.”
Adults often complicate things more than is necessary, or even helpful. Indeed, there is brilliance in simplicity. Great marketers and advertisers have always known this. It is one of the reasons companies spend millions of dollars to whittle the complexity of their ideas, products and/or services down to a sentence or logo that a five-year-old could understand. Attempting to change your corporate culture is a complex and lengthy task for certain. This is why it is imperative that you can speak about it simply.

by Susanne Biro, Leadership Coach at Bluepoint Leadership Development
0

Articles

by Bluepoint Leadership Development |


Leadership development workshops are very expensive. And I’m not just referring to the cost of facilities, materials, trainers, and bagels. When a company takes 20 or so managers out of the organization for several days, it is making a significant investment in their development. Those of us who are the architects of these workshops need to ask ourselves the question: Have we designed a workshop that is worthy of this investment? We at Bluepoint have been delivering leadership workshops for over twenty years and have learned that there are 10 core design principles that lead to a great learning experience. I would like to share these with you. 1. Research-based content A colleague of ours once mused that many leadership workshops appear to have been created by two guys in a bar in Milwaukee and recorded on the back of a beer coaster. The truth is that anyone can cobble together some interesting exercises and experiences, but to what end? We know the outcomes of great organization leadership…alignment, engagement, retention, productivity, teamwork, agility, to name a few. There is little mystery here. What many designers ignore is all the research that tells us what specific leadership behaviors, practices and approaches will create these outcomes. A good leadership workshop is grounded in this research and, as such, will equip participants with the capability to make an immediate, positive impact on their organizations. 2. Engagement The frenzied pace that most managers face today has turned the otherwise calm and thoughtful participant into a skittish, distracted bystander infected by a self-imposed form of ADD with one eye on his or her Blackberry and the other eye on the door. It’s not that these managers are disinterested in their professional development; they are simply products of today’s frenetic organizations. To get their attention, they must be entertained. While describing a good leadership workshop as entertaining may sound like a call to design a boondoggle, unless the workshop can successfully compete with the myriad of distractions facing today’s manager, we will simply be hosting adult day-care. The famous communications guru, Marshall McLuhan, made the connection even more direct with this statement: “It’s misleading to suppose there’s any basic difference between education and entertainment.” Videos, stories, games, debates, physical experiences and colorful materials all play an important role in participant engagement. 3. Story-telling Every participant comes to the workshop with their own unique leadership story that has grown out of their experiences, beliefs, fears, biases and aspirations. A great workshop challenges the participant to create a bigger story for him or herself and the people that they lead. This can only happen when the participant has the opportunity to tell his or her current story and have it honored in the classroom. Once this happens, a new story can be crafted. The greater the story, the greater the development. 4. Feedback No workshop ingredient is more potent than feedback. Whether it be multi-rater assessments or direct one-on-one communication, feedback is a powerful stimulus for personal change. And that’s what leadership development really is…personal change. What limits the use of feedback in leadership workshops? I believe it is largely our own arrogance. Too often we feel that the participant cannot handle the feedback. They are too fragile. They will somehow be irreparably damaged by our words or those of fellow participants. Or it may be our own insecurities. We will lose control of the workshop. Emotions will run rampant. We will not be able to handle the resulting carnage. Remember, the workshop is not about you; it’s about the participant. Be bold in creating a feedback-rich environment. The participants will thank you for the gift, maybe not now, but someday. 5. Appreciation The problem with many leadership development workshops is that there is an underlying assumption that the ideal leader needs to develop a predetermined set of corporate competencies while becoming some fantastic amalgamation of Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Gandhi and Jack Welch. Let’s leave that idea to the boys at the bar in Milwaukee. We do not discard these elements entirely from the design process. Corporate culture and strategy rightly have a bearing on workshop design, and there is also much we can learn from the great leaders of the past. However, the best workshops are based on the assumption that all participants come uniquely gifted for the challenge of leadership, and the role of the workshop is to help them identify and cultivate these gifts. It is not our job to help them become the next Steve Jobs, but rather someone much more potent…the best leadership version of themselves. A workshop that is designed to help the participants accelerate the development of their natural strengths is much more potent than one designed to fix the participant or change him or her into the model corporate leader. 6. Intense experiences I have now asked thousands of workshop participants to reflect on the following five items and select the one that had the most influence on their development as a leader. Reading and Research Performance appraisals Coaching and Mentoring Challenging experiences Formal training “Challenging experiences” was selected by over 90 % of the respondents. (It’s interesting to note that “Performance appraisals” always comes in dead last, but that’s a topic for another column.) Even though most designers are keenly aware of these findings, there is a great temptation to fill the workshop agenda with content that is largely extraneous such as succession planning models, managerial competencies, and corporate values. While the intention to provide material that can be applied back on the job is laudable, this information is largely ignored. People can read. Give them the content beforehand. Use the workshop as a learning laboratory where the participants are confronted with real leadership situations. Challenge them to lead at higher levels. Create a curriculum that exposes participants to intense experiences, and allow them to experiment with new behaviors and approaches. This will accelerate their learning and development. (By the way…most savvy managers have read all the corporate tenets and many of the important books on leadership anyway.) 7. Peer coaching In my ongoing survey noted in section 6, “Coaching and Mentoring” always comes in second. One-on-one learning processes are very powerful because, for a period of time, it really is all about me. Because coaching requires no content knowledge, any participant can coach another with a little guidance. For those of us who make our living standing in the front of a classroom trying to be insightful, witty and sage-like, it is difficult to accept the fact that the average peer coaching session is much more effective than our most brilliant lecture. Whenever possible, get your body and ego out of the way and let the participants talk to each other. 8. Self-awareness It has been said that leadership development is an inside-out game. I like the way Manfred Kets De Vries puts it: “Healthy leaders are passionate…They are very talented in self-observation and self-analysis; the best leaders are highly motivated to spend time in self-reflection.” (Harvard Business Review, January, 2003) The leadership development workshop provides the perfect opportunity for the leader to step out of his or her chaotic schedule, put it in neutral, and take a long, fresh look inward, After all, the only thing participants can work on to improve their leadership is themselves. Put sufficient white space into the workshop design so the participant can personalize the learning. Most managers cannot remember the last time they took 15 minutes in complete silence to contemplate their own leadership journey. Give them the 15 minutes. 9. Performance breakthroughs The most frequently voiced dissatisfaction with leadership workshops is the lack of application on the job. It’s not because workshop participants do not want to change; it’s just that real change is so difficult. The pressures of the job, lack of support from their manager, no time…the list goes on. Significant improvement in leadership effectiveness rarely occurs in one big leap. We don’t see the freshly-trained leader walking through the hallways wearing saffron-colored robes, musing about shared community values and throwing rose petals on others (metaphorically speaking, that is). Change occurs incrementally and is fueled by short-term successes – a process that needs to start in the classroom. Bar the classroom door and let no one leave until they have demonstrated at least ten performance breakthroughs (again, metaphorically speaking…I think). Real change starts in the workshop, not back in the office. Start the habit of experimentation and incremental change in the workshop. 10. Learning accountability I kick-off many of my leadership coaching assignments with the eternally irritating question: “So, Sally, if nothing changes in your performance what is likely to happen?” Besides the mischievous delight I take in tormenting my clients, I have learned that I can serve them best by insisting that they take full responsibility for their actions, decisions, learning and future. Unless they take personal accountability for their development, there will always be someone else to blame…their board, their staff, their customer, their mother. So too with a leadership workshop. The question that needs to be oft asked at the workshop is “So, George, what have you learned about yourself and what are you going to do about it? Our clients often report that the two or three days spent in our leadership development workshops +
0

Articles

by Bluepoint Leadership Development |

The best architects have an inside track on human behavior. They understand the power of physical and spatial design—how we humans are subtly but inevitably shaped by the spaces in which we live and work. Indeed, the quality of our lives is significantly informed and influenced by our physical environment. In some cases, architecture will quietly constrain us, forming uncomfortable boundaries and edges around our activities. In the best cases, it will stimulate and uplift, energize and even inspire.

The great leader also has this inside track. They recognize that human beings are profoundly shaped not just by physical spaces but by social spaces. And just as we may not notice the persistent influence of the architecture around us, we often fail to appreciate the extraordinary power hidden in the unseen contours of our social environments. A significant part of leadership, therefore, involves a special kind of design. Today’s leader needs to understand how to create fertile organizational spaces—generative cultural environments that lift our spirits, nudge us forward, and raise our collaborative potential. This is why I believe that today’s leader needs to be a social architect—a builder, creator, and designer of dynamic, cultural spaces. And organizations that have those types of leaders will almost always find ways to thrive.

Over the past decade or so, most organizations have done a pretty good job of training their leaders in influence-focused competencies such as coaching, communications and team building. These are certainly important competencies that leaders use to get people to perform better within the system. However, they do not equip leaders to change the fundamental parameters of the system itself. Developing leaders with powerful influencing skills is only one part of what it takes for an organization to flourish. Great coaching, communication and the like only goes so far in an environment not intentionally designed for success. We are social animals, so culture matters. A pristine tool will only last so long in an old, wet, and rusty toolbox before it begins to resemble its environment. And this is not a job for a few C-suite execs and OD professionals. Every leader right down to the first-line supervisor needs to be a skilled designer, a social architect.

So what does it mean to be a social architect? Well, the first question to ask is simple: What is the current condition of your organization’s social space? How much care has been taken in the existing social architecture? Has it been consciously and deliberately designed to align the interests and efforts of employees, customers, clients, and stakeholders, a dynamic cultural blueprint that embodies the best values and ideals of the organization? Or has it been unconsciously derived, a kludge of partially considered values, more representative of the organization’s past battles than its aspirational future?

For too many organizations, the latter is true. Not because leadership tried and failed, but because leadership has not adequately put attention on this critical area. In order to address this common issue, I have come to believe that there are four essential areas that today’s leader needs to master: Organizational Structure, Job Design, Customer Experience, and Culture.

1. Organizational Structure
“All organizations are perfectly designed to get the results they get.” This old leadership maxim captures an important truth—we tend to hit what we aim for, even if we don’t know exactly where we are aiming! And that’s the fatal flaw in many organizational structures—they are not actually designed at all, at least in the creative, conscious sense of that word. But of course, there are many ways to design an effective, dynamic structure. No one size fits all. Let me offer four questions to consider as you think about the design of your own organization.

Does every person have a clear line-of-sight to his or her customer? Everyone has a customer, whether inside or outside the organization. People work best, in many cases by an order of magnitude, when they can see exactly how the product or service they provide serves their customer. A clear line-of-sight to the customer clarifies roles and prioritizes activity. It makes everyone’s job easier.

Does your organizational structure reward initiative? Leaders tend to get the behaviors they reward. Do you want people to be willing to give you bad news? Then don’t penalize them for doing so. Do you want people to take risks? Then be aware how you reprimand failure and reward initiative. People are smart. They learn quickly how an organization structure actually behaves. Make sure you explicitly reward the behavior you are trying to encourage.

Is the organization designed to maximize collaboration and synergy? Almost every senior executive that I know believes that there is a significant amount of collaboration and synergy throughout their organization. And why shouldn’t they? Their direct reports are telling them that this. But is it really happening? If so, it should be a valuable source of competitive advantage because it is not likely happening in your competitors’ organizations. Here is the litmus test question: Is collaboration that produces real value richly rewarded? (If so, the highest paid people in your organization will be those who make sure others get credit for their work.) And conversely: Is destructive internal competition and territorialism firmly rebuked? (Or do you go wink-wink and support the lone wolf who believes, probably correctly, that the rest of the organization just holds him or her back?) Are you giving lip service to the values of collaboration, teamwork, and partnership or have you designed an organization structure that demands it??

Is the organization designed on the notion of “premeditated agility”? It is hard on the ego to create the very best possible plans and strategies….and then design an organization that will fix your mistakes. Leaders are not infallible. Don’t set up an organization that pretends they are. Senior leaders need to recognize that all of their strategies and decisions are imperfect, to some degree, and explicitly empower people throughout the organization to use their good judgment to implement better decisions and strategies to create more value or better serve the customer.

2. Job Design
There are the three critical principles that need to guide all job design when it comes to the social architecture of an organization.

Create Clear Accountabilities – Forget the outdated notion of job descriptions. Hold people accountable for specific outcomes. In many organizations, people are held accountable for processes. Customer service. Financial reporting. Project management. These are processes. They have fluid boundaries and overlapping responsibilities, making it easy to blur responsibility, make excuses, or dodge accountability. They also encourage territorial behavior and a “follow-the-rules” mindset. Outcomes are different. Delighted customers. Accurate, timely financials. A specific project completed on time and within budget. An effective leader designs jobs with clear outcomes, encouraging creativity, autonomy, and problem solving.

Maximize Freedom – Provide people with a scary amount of freedom to create their own priorities, make their own decisions, and do the work they love. Often the problems in an organization start with one common, overriding tenet—everyone needs a boss. Underlying this is the belief that people cannot be trusted to be responsible. Don’t design that conviction into the fabric of your organizational culture, or you may get what you expect. Maximize freedom in a context of real accountability and people will surprise you.

Craft Big Jobs – Abandon the outdated idea of delegation. No one wants to do your work; people want to do their own work. Design the absolute biggest jobs possible—just a little too big for the incumbent—and then you take on whatever bits and pieces are left over. A little spillover drudgery will be worth it if it means your team members aim high and push their limits.

3. Customer Experience
Sadly, most companies never think about intentionally designing their customers’ experiences. In order to design an incredible customer experience, we have to put ourselves in the customer’s shoes. This is not simply a high level of customer service; it’s a complete change of perspective. We have to see the product or service and the organization from the outside, so to speak—from a customer or client perspective—and then design the customer experience from that vantage point. The authentic empathy in this perspective takes real development and leadership. One has to suspend one’s own perspective and adopt that of another—value what they value, believe what they believe, fear what they fear, and see what they see. Few companies truly succeed at this, but the ones who do prosper.

4. Culture
Just as every human being has a personality, every organization has a culture. The moment there are two or more people, collective cultural values begin to emerge. And as any organization grows, that culture, with its own unique personality, will develop. Can leaders design organizational culture? I don’t think so. But they can have an impact on it—give it direction and infuse it with aspirational values. And they can build pathways towards that ideal culture. Will they ever arrive at that destination? Probably not, but it doesn’t matter. An effective culture is born in the authentic aspiration. And a leader’s actions and interactions make the difference between a pretense on a piece of paper, and a living, breathing culture where people care about embodying the better values of an organization.

“Design is a funny word.” claimed the late Steve Jobs. “Some people think design means how it looks. But of course, if you dig deeper, it’s really how it works.” Today’s most effective leaders, experts in creating organizational architecture, understand how to design social spaces that work for everyone.

0

Articles


by Gregg Thompson |

The coaching wrap-up conversation over coffee quickly turned uncomfortable, at least for me. “You touched me,” said my client, “you really touched me.” With a quick “thank you” in return, I tried to quickly change the topic to something much more benign. (My mind is racing…Is he a football fan? Will a comment about last weekend’s games provide a quick detour in the conversation?) He was not to be dissuaded. “You are not hearing me, Gregg. You touched me here.” This time he pointed directly at the middle of his chest. “Right here!”

It seems that I have spent many years positioning leadership coaching as a practical and potent performance improvement process (and it clearly is that) while minimizing the more personal aspects of this work. After all, we are coaches, not counselors. And not just regular coaches for that matter. We are leadership coaches whose clients are primarily senior business managers. We use words like “partnership” and “challenges”, not “intimacy” and “compassion.” We ask our clients to step up to a bigger game, not get in touch with their feelings. And now, sitting right in front of me is the seasoned COO of a major manufacturing enterprise telling me that our coaching work has not only rekindled his passion for leadership, but for life itself. * He continues, “I have made three commitments, and I am living these every day. First, I have committed to have a positive impact on the jobs, careers and lives of every single person in our organization, regardless of their position. Second, I have recommitted myself to be a genuine servant leader in my family. Third, I have committed to leave this planet a better place in some way when my time is done.” And then he said the words to which I had no response: “My heart has opened up to a whole new world.”

In this column I often provide a few insights or aphorisms for those readers who are interested in the leadership development field. This time I simply have some reminders for myself:

When I am coaching I need to remember that:

  1. I cannot separate the leader from the person. The whole person is in the coaching relationship with me. I need to have the courage to bring my full humanity to the coaching relationship.
  2. All leadership development is, in fact, personal development. The person being coached is the instrument of leadership, and the only way that development can occur is when the leader works on him or herself. I need to remember that I can serve others best by being a fellow learner rather than a teacher.
  3. The most intense leadership development is a result of a deep personal commitment. I need to keep in mind that all real learning is self-directed and people will only change when they decide to do so.

Coaches give little advice. We mostly remind our clients of their talents, their passions, their aspirations and their potential. That day over coffee, my client reminded me so clearly of one of the most important tenets of this work – it is impossible to fully explore leadership potential without touching the heart along the way.


*I rarely write about my coaching conversations much less quote my clients, however in this case, my client not only gave me his permission, he encouraged me to write the article. I thank him for his thoughtfulness and generosity.


by Gregg Thompson, President of Bluepoint Leadership Development.
0

Articles

by Gregg Thompson |
When great leaders speak, things happen! People become engaged. Teams gel. Customers are served. Problems are solved and products are invented. Such is the power of a leader’s communication. So important is communication that it is difficult to find a leadership text that does not devote a significant portion of its pages to the topic. Unfortunately, most such works present communication as simply another important leadership competency up there with project management and strategic thinking. Communication is not a leadership competency; it is your leadership. Leadership and communication are synonymous; virtually all of one’s leadership is manifested through communication. As James C. Humes wrote: “Every time you speak, you are auditioning for leadership.”
We should hold leaders to a much higher standard of communication than others. Most others are measured primarily on their ability to efficiently and accurately convey information. Leaders need to do more than simply inform; they need to communicate in ways that get people (as John M. Kane once said) thinking and acting together. They need to create not just understanding, but action. In fact leaders should be judged not by their performances as communicators, but rather by the performance of those they seek to lead. Think about your own leadership. Are the people on your team or in your organization more inspired, more productive and more innovative because of what you communicate? Are you simply an efficient transmitter of information, or are others changing the way they think and act as a result of the words you choose to use?
Fortunately, great communication is an observable and learnable set of practices that are within the reach of all leaders. Leaders at all organization levels can significantly increase their communication effectiveness by adopting the three universal, powerful practices that have been employed by great leaders in organizations of all kinds. These men and women connect with their constituents on a Personal level, construct an enticing image of the Future, and create a compelling Story in which everyone has a starring role.

• Personal. All communication is personal. For the leader, there is no such thing as communication that is strictly business. Unless the listeners decide to allow the leader’s words to touch them personally, their words simply become a part of the organizational noise that is omnipresent today. Picture your listeners with a remote control in their hands. They can shut you off at any point when you no longer are able to keep the personal connection open. Great leaders communicate to us personally. Whether they are speaking to one person or a thousand, they are able to connect with each as individuals. They recognize that others are listening through lenses shaped by their own interests and values, and they make it their job to illuminate these elements in their communication. They share their own driving passions and most exciting They share their own driving passions and most exciting aspirations. They make others feel valued and uniquely important.

• Future. Great leaders invite others to join them in pursuit of a tomorrow that is better than today. Confidence and optimism are apparent in all of their communication. Their positive, enthusiastic view of the future is obvious in everything they say, whether it is ordering office supplies or presenting corporate strategy. They are, however, not simply arm-waving cheerleaders. They view their role as one of advancing the organization along the continuum of time. They see the organization’s future as an extension of its history and current state of affairs. In their communication they honor the heroes and victories of the past, give voice to the realities of the present (both harsh and positive), and reveal and invite others to join them on the path forward.

• Story. Leaders craft big stories for their teams and organizations not just to be entertaining or engaging. They do so because this is the only way humans can think and relate to each other. As Isak Dinesen wrote: “To be a person is to have a story to tell.” We see the world (and our jobs) through stories. It is through stories that we can connect to an organization’s mission and plans. Great leaders make these plans come alive through rich, engaging stories that capture our attention. Most importantly, they help others connect their personal stories with the organization’s story and enhance both in the process. And when they help us see our own starring role in the stories, they elicit our very best efforts.
Great leadership communication is less about the efficient transmission of information and much more about the impact it has on others. The challenging question for all who seek to lead is this: “Are the members of my team or organization more aligned, more committed and more engaged because of what I say and write?”

Fortunately, great leadership communication is not the exclusive domain of a gifted, charismatic few. It is within the reach of all who care enough about others to connect with them personally, to share their most hopeful view of the future and to craft a grand story that provides a special sense of meaning and purpose.

by Gregg Thompson, President of Bluepoint Leadership Development and author of several books, including “Unleashed: Leader As Coach”

0